Somewhere around last month when there was no internet in Rajasthan for three days straight, I had too much time on my hands and two assignments due. One of them was not as exciting as the other and would not really add to my overall grade. For the latter, I had to write about Shakespeare's adaptations outside the Anglo-Saxon world for my drama class, and so I did. It took almost a week and I am super proud of how it turned out. All throughout my school, assignments involved a lot of tacky glitter pens and craft material and there was little I could actually be happy doing. Growing up, I did not have a lot of good teachers. Most of them were either bullies or just really bad at teaching their subjects. One of the very few who stood out was Rakshita Ma'am. She taught me English for two consequent years and god did I love it! And I wasn't alone; everyone she taught loved her. I remember she would give us feedback for the answers and essays and stories we would have to write. She would be very happy reading this assignment and knowing full well that I am getting marks for doing something I have always loved.
Flashback aside, here is the assignment that I am very cleverly using to make you all forget about the seven months I have been MIA:
Shakespeare’s relevance, even after 400 years of his death owes itself to his universal and flexible themes. But I for one thoroughly believe that we should give credit where it is due—in the sheer imagination of the artists who have and continue to adapt Shakespeare. Without them, Shakespeare’s legacy would have never molded itself into the dynamic and phenomenally diverse cultural fabric outside the Anglo-Saxon world. Would the insurgency in Kashmir or the Mumbai underworld ever be the backdrop of Hamlet (Haider) and Macbeth (Maqbool) if not for Vishal Bhardwaj’s sheer ambition and imagination? Would the truce between the Capulets and Montagues ever be the weapon to honor kill Romeo (the Hindu Parma) and Juliet (the Muslim Zoya) if not for Habib Faisal’s didactic Muslim gaze in Ishaqzaade? The thing with any phenomenon is that you can never really pinpoint a clear reason behind its gigantic success and influence. Shakespeare was a phenomenon.
Ishaqzaade, Haider, Maqbool
Romeo becomes the dashing, testosterone-loaded stud Romil and Juliet becomes the 'chocolate-boy good looks' (as his younger sister Ramya describes him) Jugal. Capulets become the staunch academic Subramaniams and Montagues become the overstated, extra-loud Kohlis. It is a clash of cultures and stereotypes; Chetan Bhagat's 2 States all over again. It is all set in a fictional hill-station named Caulvingunj, set in Himachal Pradesh (for Romil and Jugal go for a concert in Manali on a weekend picnic). Caulvingunj is like every small town ever where everyone knows everyone and it does not take too long for rumors and truths to spread. Romil and Jugal go to a college, even though we are never told what they study. Not that it really matters. Romil directs the titular parent play, Romeo and Juliet for his college theatre, along with his best friend Mehar who clearly likes him despite his sexuality. Jugal rejects the sexual advances of his dad's boss's daughter, Rosie. This ceases the promotion of his dad and soon there is a new family in town, the Kohlis, the patriarch having gotten the designation Jugal's dad was aiming for. Unlike the original text, there is no Rosaline who renounces the world and becomes a nun, thus breaking Romeo's heart. Instead, Jugal appears in the show before Romil does. It is love at first sight for him, replicating the first time Romeo saw Juliet at the Capulet house. There is no way that Romil could be into men with his over-the-top masculinity and conventionally cis-heterosexual disposition. Jugal is smitten by his good looks and emotional unavailability and casts him as Romeo in his play, much to his best friend's dismay. In instructing Juliet (played by Rosie) on how to say her dialogues, he frequently plays Romil's Juliet and gets even closer to him. Much like Romeo and Juliet, what lies within Romil's perfectly toned body barely matters to Jugal. It is raging hormones and the lack of any queer action in town that cast a spell on Jugal, giving him the stupidity and courage to profess his love through a kiss on the aforementioned Manali trip. In exchange, Romil gives Jugal a black eye. It is his sheer toxic masculinity that we are expected to use as a justification for his violence. Jugal is heartbroken, bruised and self-jilted but soon enough, Romil climbs on his balcony (replicating the infamous scene from Romeo and Juliet) and gives first-aid to his literal and figurative wounds with a passionate kiss. Turns out that that seemingly straight jock is not really straight.
Gay men in Hindi cinema had never looked so straight. Truth be told; they barely existed. Beyond the indie queer gaze of Onir's I Am and the real-life tragedy of Aligarh's Professor Siras, Hindi cinema (or Indian cinema at large, if you really ask me) diversity of any kind is dismal, let alone the diversity within a minority community.
Passion and gay love blossom within the constraints of fake contact names and shady huts on the city outskirts. It does not take long for Ramya to follow Jugal one day and see him in an intimate moment with Romil. She does not really out him but it is Romil's reluctance to accept his identity that creates the environment for his parents to mistake Romil and Jugal as "close friends" and engage him with Rosie (she becomes the count Paris to Romeo instead of Juliet). Jugal, despite his understated masculinity is the one who comes out to his parents in a moment of impulse and betrayal. He is the courageous one here. But this is where the straight gaze of the show creeps in. Any piece of art that judges and shames queer people for not coming out comes from a place that does not really understand the consequences of coming out. Soon, everyone in the town knows about Romil and Jugal being a "gay" couple and they face a social boycott of sorts where their college principal says, "Even I went to college in the US but "all this" is unnatural." Romil is forced to come out to his family by the straight gaze of the show. Banishment becomes "coming out" here and both Romil and Jugal, its prey. Why 20-year-old college students are coming out to their parents and leaving cities for someone they have known for two months is something only Shakespeare can answer. Is it the preposterous passion of the original text being replicated? If you ask someone who is just as old as the protagonists, their answer will be "because it happens in real life". Indian teenagers get in similar and worse situations quite often and it is not just their parents they lose hope in, but also society.
Homophobia and ignorance are rampant in Caulvingunj, across ethnicities and generations. Jugal's literary mother reads Arundhati Roy's A God Of Small Things with its incestuous themes and radicalism but calls homosexuality an American trend. Jugal's younger sister, Ramya calls Brokeback Mountain a waste of two handsome men. Romil's family is no different. The only allies in this show are Mehar and her mom. Mehar is the closest Romil and Jugal gets to portraying the nurse. She is cool, hipster, has a very Katrina Kaif-esque Hindi accent and above all, is unconditionally in love with Jugal. She might not possess the nurse's vulgar humor but she loves Jugal just as much as the nurse loved Juliet. And better still, she does not betray him. Her mom gives shelter to a heartbroken Jugal, betrayed both by his family and lover (a heartbroken Romeo crying over Rosaline (?)) who seeks solace in slack and alcohol. She might as well just be the Friar, Lawrence, as she is the one both Romil and Jugal's moms reach out to make their kids "understand". But she is firm in her beliefs, knowing full well that there is nothing that Romil and Jugal need more than their support and acceptance. There is no Mercutio flexing his comic timing but the show makes up for it with its decent rom-com setting. Romil and Jugal both possess a set of guy friends who objectify women and call fruit beer “gay” but they are not important enough to be remembered by their names. Multiple Mercutios maybe?
Jugal's sister Ramya, still in high-school, crazily infatuated by Romil is the one who confronts Romil and calls him a coward for saying yes to marrying Romie despite being gay. She is also the nurse. There are more than two nurses in this show, if you count Mehar’s mom. A moved Romil seeks forgiveness from Jugal and both of them move to Mumbai to work at call centers and run errands. Why this impracticality? Ask Shakespeare. The very essence of Romeo and Juliet is immature, senseless passion. If leaving your undergraduate degree to seek employment in Mumbai is impractical, so was choosing death over marrying the prince instead of Romeo.
Jugal might be more appealing, but it is Romil who has bigger inner demons to fight. In one remarkable scene, he buys a condom to make out with Rosie, hence trying to brush off the "phase" called homosexuality. He fails, naturally. Raised in a much more boisterous household than the Subramaniams, there was little he could be but a pumped-up jock. He hates mangoes but drinks mango shake every morning because his mom finds happiness in it. He has semi-nude pictures of female models in his room in order to appear straight. Truth be told, he has more depth than both Romeo and Juliet combined solely on the basis of his sexual identity. There exists no character like Romil in Hindi cinema before 2017 (a year before homosexuality was decriminalized in India). He is a revelation despite the show's lightheartedness.
The infamous balcony scene and passion of Romeo and Juliet
Ram and Leela kill each other in Bhansali’s Ram Leela
One of the most iconic things about Romeo and Juliet is the scene where deaths are faked in order to live happily ever after. Sanjay Leela Bhansali's Goliyon ki Rasleela: Ram Leela does it in a more subtle way. Leela carelessly signs an order that reads the killing of Saneras, the rival community that Ram heads. Leela hears a rumor about Ram’s death and goes berserk. Romil and Jugal, on the other hand, do it in a very Ekta Kapoor manner (who is also the producer of the show), they lie as corpses in a hospital room and convince their families that they have in fact died in a car accident. Romil says, “What we really want to know is whether you love us for who we are or for who you want us to be.” They get the sympathy they seek and their families truce with each other and their sons.
Ramya narrates all of this to Ahalya, who turns out to be a Supreme Court judge presiding over the archaic and now abolished Section 377 litigation. With this, the show brings to mainstream spotlight the misery and plight of the queer community in India. It makes a political statement despite not taking itself too seriously.
What really got me is how they bring out the tragedy of the play. Just when the show starts to end on a happy note with both the Kohlis and Subramaniams about to fly to New Zealand to meet Romil and Jugal, they get a call informing them about Romil and Jugal's divorce. Just because the protagonists madly in love with each other belonged to the same gender does not mean they will have a perfect relationship. Perfection is a universal myth.
There are a lot of discrepancies between Romil and Jugal and the original text but what really makes it an adaptation instead of an appropriation is the sincerity with which it tries to replicate the hormonal passion of the latter. Not a lot of people elope at 20 with an unfinished undergraduate degree in order to be able to love and live. But at the core of the play lies impractical passion that does not need any more synonyms.
A Tamil show that I have lately been watching is Suzhal: The Vortex which might not be a straightforward adaptation of Romeo and Juliet but it sure does extend the imaginations of adaptability. Two non-protagonist characters from two rival families elope and end up getting murdered, embraced within each other’s arms. Truce follows. Finding their murderer is one of the many mysteries in this mystery-thriller show. I did not start the show expecting a full-blown, well-written Romeo-Juliet arc but it becomes apparent mid-way that the frequent comparison of the couple with Romeo and Juliet is much more than just a dialogue. It is a well-cooked, intentional foreboding. One of the main characters says, “Being in love makes you feel big. In this tiny town, a baby love story. But it’s as though they are Romeo and Juliet. Is Regina and Shanmugan's feud that big? Kids these days are overly dramatic.” Perhaps even the bard would have never thought human sacrifice a probable cause of Romeo-Juliet’s tragic death.


